The deal is dead, leaving the future of the
northeast corner of La Grange Road and Ogden Avenue, the adjoining Gordon Park
and a pending lawsuit challenging the sale of public park land very uncertain.
The Greater La Grange Area YMCA announced Dec. 2 it has
cancelled the contract for the proposed sale of its 4.3-acre property in
downtown La Grange with Atlantic Realty Partners, refusing to negotiate with
the developer for a reduced sale price.
One thing, however, is for certain, and that is the YMCA
intends on tearing down the former Rich Port YMCA property -- to perhaps clear
the land and make it more attractive for redevelopment -- but the question is
when since no exact timeline has been set.
"We are currently considering a number of bids from
contractors in the area," revealed YMCA spokesman Christopher Ganschow,
"with the purpose of demolishing the building."
In recent weeks, Atlantic asked the YMCA to amend the contract:
“to substantially reduce the price of the property citing the current economic
downturn," stated Ganschow of the pact entered into some three years ago.
A reply was arrived at on Dec. 1.
"To agree to this would deprive the YMCA of a
substantial portion of the monies it must raise to fund a new La Grange area
YMCA," he added. "The YMCA has refused to accept Atlantic's attempt
to renegotiate the price and has cancelled the contract."
The 'bottom line," said Ganschow, is that in order to
serve the best interests of the people in its service region, the YMCA
"could not accept the (new) number that was on the table," adding,
'We're not talking about nickels and dimes here ... but a substantial
amount."
Despite the setback, the YMCA board stated it intends
"to continue to fulfill its mission" in the La Grange area by
continuing to operate its facility on 31st Street in La Grange Park. Talks also
continue with McCook and other nearby communities to build a new YMCA.
"We're going to keep our eyes and ears open to any
suggestions ... from all quarters," he said. "We're maintaining
communication with all communities until we can execute a transaction."
The contract cancellation will obviously impact resolution
or continuation of the ongoing litigation over the proposed sale of a 2.82-acre
slice of land in Gordon Park that was supposed to be part of the deal. The
purchase would have paved the way for a retail/residential complex called La
Grange Place where the shuttered Rich Port YMCA still stands, but it has been delayed
for the past two years.
The next hearing, which was to address the Park District's
petition attempting to conclude the issue, was to be heard in Cook County
Circuit Court on Dec. 19.
Settlement talks in the lawsuit pitting longtime La Grange
resident Orlando Coryell and the Park District of La Grange apparently took
place after the last hearing held Nov. 19, to seemingly no avail. A settlement
would mean an end to the two-year court battle.
But despite a proposed out-of-court settlement presented to
the Park Board Nov. 12 by the La Grange Friends of the Parks, Park District
commissioners were not budging as recent as Nov. 19. The board is scheduled to
meet again Dec. 17.
The Friends, through the head of its legal team, La Grange
attorney Tom Beyer, presented its proposals to all parties involved, a copy of
which was obtained by http://www.onlagrange.com/.
The proposal would have resulted in the project approved in
2008 to be drastically reduced due to economic worries, to 236 from the
originally proposed 306 apartments, to 18,000 square feet retail from the
original 30,000 and a parking garage one-fourth smaller in size. Proposed row
houses to be built on the park land were also nixed from the project.
The Friends state it would agree to the sale of one parcel
of land of less than one acre east of the YMCA and leave the much-disputed
Shawmut parcel dedicated as open space, with proceeds of that set aside for
future parks.
'The Park District will only get some of the funds it
seeks," wrote Beyer, "but some parkland will be preserved, the
village of La Grange and its residents will see an eyesore removed and an
increase in tax revenues and the YMCA will be able to get on with building its
new facility."
However, after presenting its response and counterproposal
privately and engaging in talks with objectors after court Nov. 19, the Park
Board that night defended itself publicly at its regularly scheduled meeting.
Contending the district "is not opposed to settlement
of this dispute," a lengthy statement read into the record at the last
board meeting Nov. 19 by Mary Ellen Penicook rejected outright the proposal
from the Friends and Beyer "removed from reality" with some points
the district cannot satisfy by law and some decisions over which it has no
control.
The 3-page message from district attorney Rob Bush called
the Friends' Nov. 12 settlement offer "a step back" from the
objector's previous proposal and added "it has become abundantly clear ...
the purported desire of (Coryell and the Friends) these past months to settle
was, and continues to be, a delay tactic."
Before ticking off a litany of reasons why it rejected the
settlement offer, Bush's letter challenged the objectors to "commit to
engaging in meaningful discussions that do not further waste the valuable time
and resources" of the district and its residents.
The response to the eight-point proposal, in short, was that
the district has no control over density, arguing that is between the
developer, Atlantic Realty Partners, and the village; it rejects entering into
an "illegal" contract with the objector that would commit it in
perpetuity to an acquisition reserve in an amount greater than the total amount
it would have earned from the transaction in the first place; it "cannot
agree" to a demand that the Shawmut parcel be forever dedicated as open
space because it is needed as an access for emergency vehicles and the
effective use of the park; it cannot bind future boards from determining the
highest and best of any park property; that a settlement should be incorporated
in a written document and that objectors shall not be reimbursed for its costs
since the entire effort of the "small group of objectors" continues
even though residents did approve the property transaction by referenda.
Calling the Friends' proposal "unfair" and
"one-sided" in favor of their wishes, it acquiesced to the sale of
just one parcel -- comprised of a maintenance shed and asphalt parking area --
in Gordon Park upon ARP's agreement to limit its purchase to that parcel upon
terms and conditions set by the district.
In exchange, however, Coryell must agree to dismiss
(withdraw) his appeal and his objections to the sale and forgo objecting to any
further proceedings in the matter.
Such a compromise would result in the district receiving
more than $3 million less in revenue, the statement read, adding doing so would
"end this tiresome and costly conflict" and allow the district and village
'to turn to more positive efforts."